Conservation vs. Hunting??
#GVIfans
We had a lecture on conservation
going over the population of animal’s om Karongwe and how they manage the
populations so the animals don't breed out of control. Zoe also went over the
biomes part of South Africa, there are surprisingly 9 biomes just in South
Africa. We looked at different conservation groups and how they work and what their
key focus is on.
A tricky concept of hunting came up, there are four styles of hunting
- Trophy
- Is
an organised hunt with a specific target within a species or herd and the
person hunting can take part of the animal back with them once it has
been taxidermized.
- Game
- This
hunt is based upon the quality of the game meat
- Canned
- Animals
bred in an enclosure to be released to be hunted
- Culling
- The
animals are killed because the population is getting to big and reducing
the productivity of the reserve overall.
I have completed a zoology degree at
uni and wildlife conservation and have never really considered hunting as
having any positive effects. After the discussion the concept of specific types
of hunting seemed to have less of a negative impact and more of a positive one.
Below is just a few examples of pro's and cons of specific situations
WILDLIFE RESERVE
PUBLIC eg: Kruger National park
Pros |
Cons |
|
|
PRIVATE
Pros |
Cons |
|
|
Once animals reach a certain age
they no longer viable reproductive their behaviour an change and this can
possibly make them dangerous and unpredictable. They get to an age and just
start destroying fences or killing other creatures that have done no harm to
them. The reserves get stuck and have to keep repairing the damage. The problem
is how do you resolve this issue? As overall the animal generally has to be
euthanatized by a veterinarian.
What would it mean to a reserve if
they placed the creature up on auction and organised a sophisticated ethical
hunt? The money would go to the reserve to help with the upkeep and to improve
their facilities such as fence upkeep, antipoaching resources, technical
upgrades in security or purchasing more animals.
The person would have the situation
explained to them and the creature would be clearly identified to this specific
person as the target. They hunter would successfully get their trophy such as
the head or hide processed and the rest of the animal would be given to the
community as it is illegal to send meat internationally. All parts of the
creature would be utilized.
A creature could be auctioned off from $100,000 to maybe $350,000. I have never considered the positives that hunting could provide. It can help the reserve and the surrounding communities directly, while reducing the negative impact unpredictable animals may bring.
Comments
Post a Comment